Cell Segmentation

Segmentation of cells in fluorescent microscopy is a relatively common image characterisation task with variations that are dependent on the specifics of fluorescent markers for a given experiment. A typical procedure might include

1. Histogram-based threshold estimation to produce a binary image.
2. Cell splitting (separating touching cells) using distance transforms and a watershed transform.
3. Refinement of initial segmentation using information from other channels.
4. Cell counting/characterisation.

This example demonstrates the procedure on a 3 channel fluorescent microscopy image. The blue channel is a DNA marker (DAPI) that stains all cells, the red channel is a marker of cell death (Ph3) while the green channel is a marker of cell proliferation (Ki67). A typical experiment might count the number of cells and measure size in the different states, where states are determined by presence of Ph3 and Ki67, various times after treatment with a drug candidate.

Acknowledgements¶

The image used in this example is part of the data distributed with the Fiji training notes by C. Nowell and was contributed by Steve Williams, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre.

Cell segmentation and splitting¶

Histogram-based threshold estimation is performed by the segChannel function, listed below. It applies light smoothing followed by the Li threshold estimator, one of a range of threshold estimation options available in SimpleITK. A cell splitting procedure using distance transforms and a marker-based watershed (implemented by segBlobs, also listed below) was then applied to the resulting mask. Distance transforms replace each foreground pixel with the distance to the closest background pixel, producing a cone-shaped brightness profile for each circular object. Touching cells can then be separated using the peaks of the cones as markers in a watershed transform. A marker image is created by identifying peaks in the distance transform and applying a connected-component labelling.

The inverted distance transform is used as the control image for the watershed transform.

Microscopes use many variants of the tiff format. This one is recognised as 3D by the SimpleITK readers so we extract slices and recompose as a color image.

In [1]:
library(SimpleITK)
## set up viewing tools
source("viewing.R")

# Utility method that either downloads data from the Girder repository or

# this is to do with size of display in Jupyter notebooks
if (!exists("default.options"))
{
default.options <- options()
}

## Extract the channels
red <- cntrl[ , , 1]
green <- cntrl[ , , 2]
blue <- cntrl[ , , 3]

cntrl.colour <- Compose(red, green, blue)

Loading required package: rPython



Display the image

In [2]:
show_inline(cntrl.colour, Dwidth=grid::unit(15, "cm"))


Set up the functions that do segmentation and blob splitting for a channel (i.e. separately for red,green blue)

In [3]:
segChannel <- function(dapi, dtsmooth=3, osmooth=0.5)
{
# Smoothing
dapi.smooth <- SmoothingRecursiveGaussian(dapi, osmooth)
# A thresholding filter - note the class/method interface
th <- LiThresholdImageFilter()
th$SetOutsideValue(1) th$SetInsideValue(0)
B <- th$Execute(dapi.smooth) # Call blob splitting with the thresholded image g <- splitBlobs(B, dtsmooth) return(list(thresh=B, labels=g$labels, peaks=g$peaks, dist=g$dist))
}

{
# Distance transform - replaces each voxel
# in a binary image with the distance to the nearest
# voxel of the other class. Circular objects
# end up with a conical brightness profile, with
# the brightest point in the center.
DT <- DanielssonDistanceMapImageFilter()
DT$UseImageSpacingOn() distim <- DT$Execute(!mask)
# Smooth the distance transform to avoid peaks being
# broken into pieces.
distimS <- SmoothingRecursiveGaussian(distim, smooth, TRUE)
distim <- distimS * Cast(distim > 0, 'sitkFloat32')
# Find the peaks of the distance transform.
peakF <- RegionalMaximaImageFilter()
peakF$SetForegroundValue(1) peakF$FullyConnectedOn()
peaks <- peakF$Execute(distim) # Label the peaks to use as markers in the watershed transform. markers <- ConnectedComponent(peaks, TRUE) # Apply the watershed transform from markers to the inverted distance # transform. WS <- MorphologicalWatershedFromMarkers(-1 * distim, markers, TRUE, TRUE) # Mask the result of watershed (which labels every pixel) with the nonzero # parts of the distance transform. WS <- WS * Cast(distim > 0, WS$GetPixelID())
return(list(labels=WS, dist=distimS, peaks=peaks))
}


Segment each channel

In [4]:
dapi.cells <- segChannel(blue, 3)
ph3.cells <- segChannel(red, 3)
Ki67.cells <- segChannel(green, 3)


The DAPI channel provides consistent staining, while the other stains may only occupy parts of a nucleus. We therefore combine DAPI information with Ph3 and Ki67 to produce good segmentations of cells with those markers.

In [5]:
# Create a mask of DAPI stain - cells are likely to be reliably segmented.
dapi.mask <- dapi.cells$labels !=0 # Mask of cells from other channels, which are likely to be less reliable. ph3.markers <- ph3.cells$thresh * dapi.mask
Ki67.markers <- Ki67.cells$thresh * dapi.mask # Perform a geodesic reconstruction using the unreliable channels as seeds. ph3.recon <- BinaryReconstructionByDilation(ph3.markers, dapi.mask) Ki67.recon <- BinaryReconstructionByDilation(Ki67.markers, dapi.mask)  Now we view the results In [6]: sx <- 1:550 sy <- 1450:2000 r1 <- red[sx, sy] g1 <- green[sx, sy] b1 <- blue[sx, sy] colsub <- Compose(r1, g1, b1) dapisub <- dapi.cells$thresh[sx, sy] == 0
dapisplit <- dapi.cells\$labels[sx, sy] == 0


A subset of the original - note speckled pattern of red stain in some cells

In [7]:
show_inline(colsub, pad=TRUE)